I've got more than a small personal stake in this quest. Nevertheless, I believe that a world-champion-level Go machine can be built within 10 years, based on the same method of intensive analysis-brute force, basically-that Deep Blue employed for chess. Ten years later, the best Go programs still can't beat good human players. Noting that the best Go programs could not even handle the typical novice, they predicted that none would ever trouble the very best players. These critics pointed to weiqi, an ancient Chinese board game, better known in the West by the Japanese name of Go, whose combinatorial complexity was many orders of magnitude greater than that of chess. ![]() ![]() Many people argued that we had tailored our methods to solve just this one, narrowly defined problem, and that it could never handle the manifold tasks that serve as better touchstones for human intelligence. You might have thought that we had finally put the question to rest-but no.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |